Web Live News

Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury said, “Kapil Sibal spoke about this even earlier. He seems to be very concerned about the Congress party and the need for introspection. But we didn’t see his face in elections in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, or Gujarat.”

Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury hit out at senior party leader Kapil Sibal for his criticism of the Congress in the wake of the party’s poor show in the Bihar polls and Assembly bye-elections.

The battle of words in the fabulous old gathering, which brought the attention back on the initiative inquiry, proceeded on Wednesday as Chowdhury said that Sibal needs reflection. “Kapil Sibal talked about this much before. He is by all accounts worried about the Congress party and the requirement for reflection. Yet, we didn’t see his face in races in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, or Gujarat,” ANI cited Chowdhury as saying.

Stating that simple talk won’t accomplish anything, the gathering chief stated, “Had Kapil Sibal gone to Bihar and Madhya Pradesh, he might have demonstrated that what he is stating is right and that he fortified the situation of Congress. The simple talk will accomplish nothing. Talking without taking any kind of action doesn’t mean reflection.”

Sibal, in a meeting with The Indian Express, had said individuals not, at this point considered the to be as a “compelling other option” and said the authority was not tending to the issue. The Congress, he stated, knows the issues it is looking at just as the appropriate responses, however, was not ready to remember them.

On Tuesday, Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot hit out at Sibal for broadcasting his perspectives openly, while a few chiefs like MPs Vivek Tankha and Karti Chidambaram emphasized what Sibal said. In a progression of tweets, Gehlot said there was “no need” for Sibal to make reference to “inside issues” in the media. He said after each discretionary misfortune, the Congress had indicated “unified and firm confidence in the gathering authority” and had arisen more grounded from every emergency.

Hitting out at Sibal, Gehlot had tweeted, “There was no requirement for Mr. Kapil Sibal to (have) referenced our inside issue in the media. This has harmed the estimations of gathering laborers the nation over. Congress has seen different emergencies including 1969, 1977, 1989 and later in 1996 — however every opportunity we came out more grounded because of our philosophy, projects, strategies and firm confidence in party initiative.”

Then again, Tankha, a Rajya Sabha MP and the top of the Congress’ legitimate office upheld Sibal’s stand. Addressing The Indian Express, he stated, “We can’t see the gathering sliding. We can’t see it sliding. Others may not talk since they have their own issues. I and Kapil have no different issues. Our issue is the recovery of the Congress. Also, if individuals as us don’t approach and talk about it, history won’t excuse us.”