Web Live News

“The three accused who have been named work in different fields, locations and no link between the three has been established in investigation,” stated the closure report.

Arnab Goswami, Feroz Shaikh and Nitesh Sarda, the three persons named in the May 2018 suicide note by interior designer Anvay Naik, on the basis of which an abetment to suicide case was made out against the three, are not linked to each other in any way, and did not commit any act that made living unbearable for Naik or left him with no option but to commit suicide.

These are the reasons given by the official researching the passings of Naik and his mom for documenting ‘A Summary’ report under the steady gaze of a judge’s court in Raigad a year ago in association with the body of evidence enrolled against the three men in May 2018.

“The three blamed who have been named work in various fields, areas and no connection between the three has been set up in the examination,” expressed the conclusion report (got to by The Indian Express) recorded on April 16 by Inspector Suresh H Varade, who right now confronting a departmental test for “wilfully excluding realities” for the situation.

The report added, “No proof has been found so far in the examination that the activity with respect to the three denounced named in the self-destruction note up to this point, separately or together, made it unendurable for the expired to keep living or had no choice except for to end it all. Subsequently, without proof for this situation, ‘A last’ outline ought to be acknowledged.”

Varade, who started exploring the situation when he was a controller with the Alibaug police, was joined by the region traffic division when he presented the conclusion report.

The report likewise expressed that at the different spots where Concorde Designs Private Limited, the firm run by Anvay and his mom, was doing up the insides for the workplaces of the three charged, either the work was left inadequate or not finished inside the timetable specified in the agreement. “The charged at that point completed the work among themselves and paid the sellers, according to the records submitted before the police,” it said.

“Examination has uncovered that since the previous six to seven years (before 2018), Concorde has been confronting monetary misfortunes, because of which Anvay Naik and his mom were under mental pressure. Since his mom was an accomplice in the organization, he choked her to death, composed a self-destruction note, and afterward hung himself,” the report additionally said.

Subtleties with the Registrar of Companies (got to by The Indian Express) show Concorde had a Rs 26.5 crore obligation as of financial 2016. From that point forward, the organization was dormant and didn’t document its yearly legal gets back with the Registrar of Companies.

A board of trustees containing extra director of police (Raigad-Alibaug), area government pleader (Raigad-Alibaug), and Varade held a gathering on December 20, 2018, where the administration pleader and Varade suggested recording ‘A rundown’. Boss Judicial Magistrate L G Pachchhe acknowledged the ‘A Summary’ report on April 16, 2019. Supporter Vaibhav Karnik, speaking to the Naiks, stated, “The police conclusion report depended on a few records like charge notes presented by the blamed that were not countersigned and consequently, their veracity is dubious.”

The Naiks have likewise claimed that the denounced are connected to one another. Anvay’s girl Adnya has stated, “When my dad would request that Feroz Shaikh settle up, he would state even Goswami has not done as such. How could he realize who had made the installments? It implies they were connected to one another. There have been endeavors produced using the very first moment by the police to dishonor the case and Varade additionally attempted to make us sign an explanation that we need to take the protest back.”

Last May, Home Minister Anil Deshmukh had tweeted that the CID has been asked to re-open the case. In the end, the case was given back to the Raigad police to do “further examination” considering “new proof”.

The new proof, said the police, came as a portrayal given by Naik’s better half Akshata to the Raigad SP on October 12 this year, giving 35 reasons why the case ought to be resumed. The greater part of these reasons is connected to police agents not following appropriate methodology at the cabin where the bodies were found.

The family has likewise raised slanders on Varade’s job. One of the complaints is that he kept on researching the case despite being moved from Alibaug police to the traffic division.

Additionally, Akshata griped about the police going to Mumbai to record Goswami’s assertion as opposed to giving him a notification to show up before the Alibaug police. The family has additionally asserted that Goswami’s assertion was recorded in the lodge of a senior Mumbai Police official and henceforth, the examination report doesn’t specify where his assertion was taken.

It was following this portrayal that the Raigad police returned the case and captured the three charged.