Delhi: To boost property tax, SDMC adopts ‘carrot-stick’ policy
In case of unauthorized colonies, pending tax from 2004-2019 will be completely waived and property holders can deposit tax for only two financial years – 2019-20 and 2020-21.
The South civic body will be using a ‘carrot and stick’ policy to increase its revenue hit by the Covid pandemic, under which it has come up with an amnesty scheme for property holders to deposit their pending taxes. If they don’t, demand notices would be served to them.
Under the plan, property holders who take care of their exceptional obligations by September 30 will be qualified for 100% intrigue and punishment waiver while the individuals who store charge for the current monetary year (2020-21) by September 30 will get a 15% discount, said South body standing advisory group executive Rajdutt Gehlot.
If there should arise an occurrence of unapproved provinces, forthcoming expense from 2004-2019 will be totally postponed and property holders can store charge for just two budgetary years – 2019-20 and 2020-21 – said Gehlot.
As far as numbers, the SDMC has so far gathered Rs 425 crore from around 3.60 lakh properties, which in the comparing time frame a year ago was Rs 550 crore from 4 lakh properties. Seven lakh out of the 12 lakh properties in South MCD alone don’t make good on charges. These are generally unapproved provinces and towns. On the off chance that individuals actually don’t cover forthcoming assessments, authorities stated, request notification would initially be given to business foundations. “These interest notification will have subtleties of the expenses not being paid, alongside intrigue determined, and are lawfully restricting reports,” said a senior authority of South MCD.
There are around 50,000 business properties in South Delhi under the expense net. Afterward, notification would be sent to private provinces also, he said.
Responding to the plan, AAP pioneer and SDMC councilor Vikas Goyal said as opposed to asking charges from unapproved states, the organization should zero in on giving offices in these regions. “Councilors can’t spend their assets in unapproved provinces, so for what reason would, they say they are requesting charges? Also, in the event that they can, at that point, a goal ought to be passed in the house that corporators can spend their assets so it is clear.”
Authorities, be that as it may, said disinfection, schools, and wellbeing offices are given in these states and more offices can be given just if there is cash.
There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?
Write a comment